Study questions use of androgen deprivation therapy for certain prostate cancer cases

Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

elderly man_oncology news australia_800x500Among men with unfavourable prostate cancer and moderate or severe co-existing illness, long-term follow-up finds that radiation therapy alone vs radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy was associated with decreased overall and cardiac mortality, according to a study in the September 22/29 issue of JAMA.

Six months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation therapy (RT) vs RT alone prolongs survival and is the standard treatment for unfavourable prostate cancer.

A post-randomisation analysis suggested that men with moderate or severe comorbidity (co-existing illness) had no survival benefit from combined therapy.

Using updated data from this trial, Anthony V. D’Amico, M.D., Ph.D., of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and colleagues compared overall survival and mortality from prostate cancer, cardiac, or other causes in all men and those within comorbidity subgroups by treatment group.

prostate cancer_oncology news australiaBetween December 1995 and April 2001, 206 men with unfavourable-risk prostate cancer were randomly assigned to receive RT alone or RT and 6 months of ADT at 3 academic and 3 community-based centres in Massachusetts.

The researchers found that at a median follow-up of 17 years, RT alone vs RT and ADT was associated with significantly decreased overall and cardiac mortality in men with moderate or severe comorbidity.

This is in contrast to no association with overall mortality at a median follow-up of 8 years.

Although RT alone vs RT and ADT was associated with increased mortality in men with none or minimal comorbidity, mortality among all men assigned to RT alone was not significantly increased.

“The association of treatment with RT alone with decreased cardiac and overall mortality in men with moderate or severe comorbidity suggests that administering ADT to treat unfavourable-risk prostate cancer in these men should be carefully considered,” the authors write.
[hr] SourceJAMA


About Author

ONA Editor

The ONA Editor curates oncology news, views and reviews from Australia and around the world for our readers. In aggregated content, original sources will be acknowledged in the article footer.

Comments are closed.