Personalised tumour vaccine shows promise in pilot trial

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

A new type of cancer vaccine has yielded promising results in an initial clinical trial conducted at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and the Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania.

The personalised vaccine is made from patients’ own immune cells, which are exposed in the laboratory to the contents of the patients’ tumour cells, and then injected into the patients to initiate a wider immune response.

The trial, conducted in advanced ovarian cancer patients, was a pilot trial aimed primarily at determining safety and feasibility, but there were clear signs that it could be effective: About half of the vaccinated patients showed signs of anti-tumour T-cell responses, and those “responders” tended to live much longer without tumour progression than those who didn’t respond.

One patient, after two years of vaccinations, was disease-free for another five years without further treatment.

The study is published today in Science Translational Medicine.

“This vaccine appears to be safe for patients, and elicits a broad anti-tumour immunity–we think it warrants further testing in larger clinical trials,” said study lead author Janos L. Tanyi, MD, an assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Penn Medicine.

The study was led by Lana Kandalaft, PharmD, PhD, MTR, George Coukos, MD, PhD, and Alexandre Harari, PhD, of the Lausanne Branch of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research. Kandalaft and Coukos devised a novel method for making a vaccine of this sort while at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

Most cancer vaccines developed to date have been designed to recognise and attack a specific known molecule–such as a cell-surface receptor–that is likely to be found on cancerous cells in any patient with that type of tumour.

Each vaccine is essentially personalised for the individual patient, using the patient’s own tumour which has a unique set of mutations and thus a unique presentation to the immune system

The approach taken by the Lausanne-Penn team is more ambitious. Each vaccine is essentially personalised for the individual patient, using the patient’s own tumour which has a unique set of mutations and thus a unique presentation to the immune system. It is also a whole-tumour vaccine, meant to stimulate an immune response against not just one tumour-associated target but hundreds or thousands.

“The idea is to mobilise an immune response that will target the tumour very broadly, hitting a variety of markers including some that would be found only on that particular tumour,” Tanyi said.

The vaccine harnesses the natural process of T-cell immunity to tumours, but enhances it to help overcome tumours’ formidable defenses.

Tanyi and colleagues made each patient’s vaccine by sifting through the patient’s own peripheral blood mononuclear cells for suitable precursor cells, and then growing these, in the lab, into a large population of dendritic cells.

Dendritic cells are essential for an effective T-cell immune response.

They normally ingest infectious pathogens, tumour cells, or anything else considered “foreign,” and re-display pieces of the invader to T-cells and other elements of the immune system, to trigger a specific response.

The researchers exposed the dendritic cells to specially prepared extracts of the patient’s tumour, activated the cells with interferon gamma, and injected them into the patient’s lymph nodes, in order to prime a T-cell response.

The team tested this strategy on a total of 25 patients, each of whom received a dose of tumour-exposed dendritic cells every three weeks, in some cases for more than six months.

Half of the patients that could be evaluated showed big increases in the numbers of T-cells specifically reactive to tumour material, indicating a good response to vaccination.

“The 2-year overall survival rate of these responder patients was 100 percent, whereas the rate for non-responders was just 25 percent,” Tanyi said.

One patient, a 46-year old woman, started the trial with stage 4 ovarian cancer–which generally has a very poor prognosis–following five prior courses of chemotherapy.

She received 28 doses of her personalised vaccine over a two-year period, and thereafter remained disease-free for five years.

Also promising was the finding, in tests on several of the responders, of vaccine-induced T-cells that showed high affinity for unique structures (“neoepitopes”) on their tumours.

In principle, an attack by such T-cells on tumours should be particularly powerful as well as highly tumour-specific and thus sparing of healthy cells.

Tumours typically have a repertoire of molecular defenses they can use to suppress or evade immune attacks, which is why cancer vaccines and immunotherapies have had mixed results in clinical trials to date.

Tanyi and colleagues therefore hope in future to enhance the effectiveness of their vaccine by combining it with other drugs that deactivate tumour anti-immune defenses.

Source: University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine


About Author

ONA Editor

The ONA Editor curates oncology news, views and reviews from Australia and around the world for our readers. In aggregated content, original sources will be acknowledged in the article footer.

Leave A Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.