Analysing gene expression in tumour cells from children with cancer is more likely to reveal targets for therapy than analysis of DNA mutations, according to a new study led by researchers at the UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute.
The study, published October 25 in JAMA Network Open, looked at 144 tumour samples from 128 paediatric cancer patients enrolled in four precision medicine clinical studies in the United States and Canada.
For an increasing number of cancer patients, doctors analyse the specific gene mutations in the patient’s tumour to help select the best treatment.
In children, however, this kind of genetic profiling of tumours is much less likely to reveal a target for therapy, according to first author Olena Vaske, who holds the Colligan Presidential Chair in paediatric Genomics at UC Santa Cruz.
“In paediatric cancer, it often isn’t a DNA mutation driving the cancer but an error in development caused by a change in how gene expression is regulated,” Vaske explained.
Vaske’s team at the UCSC Treehouse Childhood Cancer Initiative has focused their efforts on analysis of gene expression data derived from RNA sequencing.
When a gene is turned on, or activated, its DNA sequence is transcribed into a messenger RNA molecule.
Sequencing the RNA molecules in tumour cells reveals not only which genes are turned on in those cells, but also how active they are (a more active gene makes more RNA transcripts).
Using the Treehouse Initiative’s framework for comparative RNA sequence analysis of paediatric tumours, each patient’s data were compared to a compendium of over 11,000 tumour RNA sequencing samples from public genomic datasets.
The analysis identified unusual gene expression patterns that could be used to identify druggable genes and pathways for each patient.
“We’re looking for the outliers, the over-expressed genes that are unusual compared to other cells and that might be driving this patient’s disease,” Vaske said.
The researchers found that gene expression analysis was potentially useful for 68% of the 144 tumour samples.
In contrast, DNA mutation information was potentially useful for only 46% of the samples.
In 36% of the samples, druggable over-expressed genes and pathways were identified based on RNA analysis alone and were not apparent in the tumour DNA analysis.
This cohort study was conducted as a consortium of five institutions: UC Santa Cruz, British Columbia Children’s Hospital, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Children’s Hospital of Orange County, and the Pacific paediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium.
The clinical partners sent UCSC researchers the RNA sequencing data for children and young adults with relapsed, refractory, or rare cancer who were being treated on precision medicine protocols.
Each clinical site had its own precision medicine protocol in place, and UCSC served as a third-party institution conducting secondary analysis of each site’s tumour data.
“This was designed as a feasibility study to show that we can do this–get the data for prospective patients and process and analyse it fast enough to be useful,” said Vaske, an assistant professor of molecular, cell, and developmental biology at UCSC.
“We showed for the first time that this framework can be used consistently across separate precision medicine clinical trials.”
Although the study was not designed to assess clinical impact, the researchers did see correlations between the findings from gene expression analysis and the clinical responses of some patients.
The study also demonstrates the value of consolidating data from publicly available genomic datasets.
The UCSC team processed all of the RNA sequencing data, from both public datasets and clinical partners, in a uniform way before doing the comparative analyses.
The compendium of consolidated data, which now includes more than 12,000 tumour samples, is available to cancer researchers on the Treehouse Initiative’s website.
The team has now also built a compendium of RNA sequencing data from normal tissues.
“For the comparative analyses, it’s a numbers game, so the larger the compendium, the more robust the analysis will be. That’s why we believe so strongly in open sharing of data,” Vaske said.
The Treehouse Childhood Cancer Initiative, which Vaske cofounded, brings the power of genomics and big-data analytics to bear on the challenge of finding effective treatments for children with cancer.
Working with clinical partners, the Treehouse team now routinely participates in clinical “tumour boards,” where doctors and geneticists meet to share information and ideas on treatments for individual cancer patients.
“The next step will be to directly evaluate the clinical utility of this approach. This study has set the stage for us to do that,” Vaske said.