Long-term follow-up shows oestrogen alone and oestrogen plus progestin have opposite effects on breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

Long-term follow-up results from two large, randomised, placebo-controlled Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) trials in postmenopausal women showed that the use of oestrogen alone as menopausal hormone therapy decreased breast cancer incidence and death with persistent results after discontinuation of use, while oestrogen plus progestin increased breast cancer incidence with persistent results after discontinuation of use, according to results presented at the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, held Dec. 10-14.

“Menopausal hormone therapy with oestrogen plus progestin (for postmenopausal women with an intact uterus) and oestrogen alone (for postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy) continues to be used by millions of women worldwide,” said Rowan T. Chlebowski, MD, PhD, chief of the Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, and an investigator at The Lundquist Institute.

“Nonetheless, after nearly half a century, menopausal hormone therapy influence on breast cancer incidence and mortality remains unsettled, with discordant findings from prospective observational studies compared to findings from randomised clinical trials.”

Earlier this year, findings published by the Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer from a meta-analysis of 58 observational studies showed oestrogen plus progestin as well as oestrogen alone were both associated with significantly increased risk of breast cancer incidence, while in the Million Women Study, both oestrogen plus progestin as well as oestrogen alone were associated with significantly increased breast cancer mortality.

The current report updates earlier findings from two randomised WHI clinical trials on breast cancer incidence and breast cancer mortality in women randomly assigned to conjugated equine oestrogens (CEE) plus medroxy progesterone acetate (MPA), CEE alone, or placebo, with more than 19 years of cumulative follow-up.

“In the two randomised, placebo-controlled WHI clinical trials involving 27,347 postmenopausal women,CEE plus MPA significantly increased breast cancer incidence, with these adverse effects persisting over a decade after discontinuing use,” noted Chlebowski. “And in contrast to decades of observational study findings, in the WHI trial, CEE alone significantly reduced breast cancer incidence and significantly reduced deaths from breast cancer, with these favourable effects persisting over a decade after discontinuing use.”

Chlebowski added, “While there are differences in characteristics of participants in the observational studies compared with those in the WHI randomised trials, the discordance between the randomised clinical trial findings with respect to oestrogen alone use and observational findings are difficult to reconcile.”

Chlebowski and colleagues enrolled postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years with no prior breast cancer in one of two randomised clinical trials at 40 U.S. centres from 1993 to1998, and followed the patients through September 2016.

Postmenopausal women with an intact uterus received CEE and MPA(8,506) or placebo (8,102) fora median of 5.6 years.

Postmenopausal women who had undergone hysterectomy received CEE alone (5,310) or placebo (5,429) for a median of 7.2 years.

After 16.1 years of cumulative follow-up, among those who received CEE alone, there were 520 incident breast cancers during the post-intervention period.

Compared with women who had received placebo, those who had received CEE were 23 percent less likely to have been diagnosed with breast cancer and 44 percent less like to die from the disease, and these positive outcomes are in agreement with the earlier findings from this trial during the intervention period.

After 18.3 years of cumulative follow-up, among those who received CEE plus MPA, there were 1,003 incident breast cancers during the post-intervention period.

Compared with women who had received placebo, those who had received CEE plus MPA were 29 percent more likely to have been diagnosed with breast cancer, and this negative outcome is in agreement with the earlier finding from this trial during the intervention period.

CEE plus MPA was associated with an increased risk for death from breast cancer in the extended analysis, but it did not reach statistical significance.

Key limitations of the study include that the breast cancer mortality analyses were not protocol-specified.

However, death from breast cancer is the most clinically relevant breast cancer outcome, Chlebowski noted.

In addition, the trials evaluated one dose and schedule of CEE plus MPA or CEE alone, respectively, and findings may not apply to other preparations, doses, or schedules.


Source: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

Share.

About Author

ONA Editor

The ONA Editor curates oncology news, views and reviews from Australia and around the world for our readers. In aggregated content, original sources will be acknowledged in the article footer.

Leave A Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.