Investigational immunotherapy was safe, tolerable, showed some activity against melanoma

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

Immunity Against DiseasesAccording to results from a first-in-human phase I clinical trial published in Clinical Cancer Research, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, the investigational immunotherapeutic IMC-20D7S was safe, well tolerated, and showed signs of modest clinical activity for patients with advanced melanoma.

The lead investigator was Dr Jedd D. Wolchok, MD, PhD, the Lloyd J. Old/Virginia and Daniel K. Ludwig Chair in Clinical Investigation and chief of the Melanoma & Immunotherapeutics Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) in New York.

Dr Wolchok is also director of the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy and associate director of the Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy at MSK.

Wolchok explained that even though immunotherapy has significantly improved outcomes for some patients with advanced melanoma, many patients have tumours that do not respond to currently available treatments or have tumours that initially respond but then become resistant to them.

“In this study, we evaluated the safety and early clinical activity of a new anti-melanoma immunotherapy IMC-20D7S,” said Wolchok.

He went on to explain that IMC-20D7S is a therapeutic antibody that attaches to a molecule in melanoma cells called TYRP1 and that after attaching to the melanoma cells it recruits cells of the immune system to the area, and these cells then attack the melanoma cells.

Danny N. Khalil, MD, PhD, a medical oncology fellow working in Wolchok’s laboratory, and colleagues enrolled 27 patients ages 44–84 with advanced melanoma in the clinical trial.

All the patients had unresectable stage 3 or stage 4 disease that had progressed after or during prior treatment.

Clinical Trial letters concept_oncology news australiaThe study was designed to test escalating doses of IMC-20D7S in two different dosing schedules, an every-two-week schedule and an every-three-week schedule.

No patients had treatment-related adverse events classed as grade 3 or greater and there were no dose-limiting toxicities.

Fourteen patients had low-grade treatment-related adverse events, most commonly fatigue and constipation.

As a result, the maximum tolerated dose was not determined.

The disease-control rate, defined as stable disease or better, was 41 percent.

One patient had a complete response, as assessed by RECIST1.1 criteria, which lasted almost six months. Ten patients had stable disease as the best response.

“We were pleased to see that IMC-20D7S was safe and none of the patients had high-grade serious adverse events related to treatment,” said Wolchok. “Given that IMC-20D7S monotherapy resulted in only modest clinical activity for patients, I would anticipate that future studies will focus on evaluating agents such as this in combination with other treatments.

“The patients enrolled in this trial were all heavily pretreated; as a result, their immune systems may not have been sufficiently robust to be reinvigorated by IMC-20D7S,” continued Wolchok. “We hope that we can increase the clinical activity of IMC-20D7S by using it in combination with other treatments or by using it as a tool to deliver chemotherapeutics or radioactive particles to the melanoma cells.”
[hr] Source: Clinical Cancer Research

Share.

About Author

ONA Editor

The ONA Editor curates oncology news, views and reviews from Australia and around the world for our readers. In aggregated content, original sources will be acknowledged in the article footer.

Comments are closed.