For acute myeloid leukaemia, genetic testing is often worth the wait

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

New tailored therapies offer exciting prospects for treating acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), but taking advantage of them may require waiting a week or more for genetic testing before starting treatment, posing a dilemma for doctors and patients facing this deadly and often fast-moving disease.

A new study bolsters the evidence that this approach is safe for most patients under careful clinical oversight.

Doctors can use information available in the first day or two after diagnosis to effectively determine which patients need standard chemotherapy urgently.

The study, published in the journal Blood, suggests in stable patients, doctors can wait for genetic tests in order to try a newer therapy that is targeted to their specific cancer.

“In the majority of patients, it seems safe to wait for the diagnostic results in order to assign the patient to the correct subgroup and select the appropriate treatment, rather than using the historic one-size-fits-all chemotherapy approach,” said lead study author Christoph Röllig, MD, of Universitätsklinikum Dresden in Germany.

“We think a potential deterioration in prognosis, if it exists at all, will be much smaller than the clinical benefit a patient would gain by receiving the appropriate novel treatment.”

AML is a cancer of the blood and bone marrow that often progresses very quickly.

Most people receive their diagnosis within a few weeks after developing symptoms; if the leukaemia is left untreated, most people die within a few months.

As a result, for decades doctors have advised most of their patients to start chemotherapy immediately, often within a day of diagnosis.

Standard tests used to assess AML typically provide results within hours or days.

These include blood tests that measure the number of white blood cells in the blood and biomarkers that indicate how quickly cancer cells are multiplying, as well as tests such as echocardiograms and lung assessments that doctors use to gauge whether a patient is healthy enough to undergo chemotherapy.

Genetic testing, on the other hand, may take one to two weeks, depending on the type of test used.

The genetic characteristics of a patient’s specific cancer can be used to predict which treatments will work best.

For example, leukemias with certain genetic characteristics respond better to newer drugs than to the standard chemotherapy, while others do not respond to any available drugs and require a bone marrow transplant.

To determine whether delaying treatment has an impact on the course of the disease, the researchers analysed data from 2,263 patients treated at hospitals throughout Germany.

Comparing outcomes among patients who started treatment at different lengths of time after diagnosis, the researchers found that starting treatment later did not negatively affect patients’ prognosis, as long as patients were clinically stable at the time of diagnosis.

On the whole, the length of time between diagnosis and treatment was not associated with any significant differences in patients’ response to treatment, overall survival, or rate of early death.

This held true for patients of all ages and for those with a variety of genetic and disease characteristics.

One caveat is that starting treatment earlier is necessary for patients whose AML is clinically unstable – for example, those with infections, extremely high white blood cell counts, rapidly multiplying cancer cells, or coagulation disorders caused by the leukaemia, said Dr Röllig.

Doctors can assess these factors with initial diagnostic test results, usually available within a day or two.

Researchers said the findings not only underscore the value of tailored treatments, but also the importance of careful monitoring to determine when it is wise to start treatment before genetic test results are available.

“Clinical judgment is very, very important,” said Dr Röllig. “This study does not imply that we can become complacent. Every newly diagnosed patient must be closely monitored in order to avoid missing a worsening of the leukaemia.”

While the study included only patients treated in Germany, he said the results should be applicable in the Unites States and any developed country where intensive chemotherapy is available as the standard of care for AML.

Dr. Röllig also noted that, as a retrospective analysis, the study does not offer the same level of certainty as a randomised controlled trial.

However, ethical considerations make a randomised trial infeasible for determining the optimal treatment timing for AML.


Source: American Society of Hematology

Share.

About Author

ONA_Eloise

Our Editorial Assistant and all round digital genius!

Leave A Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.