Family history misses identifying individuals with high genetic risk of CVD or cancer

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

Certain genetic changes, termed “pathogenic variants,” substantially increase risk for cardiovascular disease and cancer – the leading causes of death – but testing to identify individual carriers is not part of current clinical practice.

Now a team led by investigators at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), USA, determined that nearly 1% of the population carry such pathogenic variants. These individuals were at markedly increased risk and could not be reliably identified based on family history.

As reported in JAMA Network Open, the researchers studied 49,738 middle-aged adults in the UK Biobank, which recruited individuals across the United Kingdom. The study focused on three genetic conditions wherein, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, identifying individuals carrying pathogenic variants can be particularly useful: familial hypercholesterolemia, which predisposes to cardiovascular disease; hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; and Lynch syndrome, which predisposes to colorectal and uterine cancers.

Working with geneticists at Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, the scientists determined that 441 (0.9%) of the UK Biobank participants carried a pathogenic variant, including 0.3% for familial hypercholesterolemia, 0.5% for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, and 0.2% for Lynch syndrome.

“We wondered how outcomes were affected for pathogenic variant carriers within the context of contemporary care,” said lead author Aniruddh Patel, MD, a cardiology fellow at MGH and Harvard Medical School.

For all three conditions, risk of associated diseases was substantially higher: 21% for familial hypercholesterolemia variant carriers vs. 9% of noncarriers, 28% of hereditary breast and ovarian variant carriers of variants vs. 8% of noncarriers, and 22% of Lynch syndrome variant carriers vs. 2% of noncarriers.

“What was really striking was that simply taking a family history – as I currently do in my clinical practice – would have failed to identify most of the high-risk individuals,” said senior author Amit V. Khera, MD, a medical director of the MGH Preventive Genomics Clinic and leader of a research group at MGH and the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.

Across the three conditions, only 40% of individuals who carried a pathogenic variant noted that a parent or sibling had been affected by the associated disease.

“What’s more is that the information was complementary – those who had both a family history and a pathogenic variant were at the highest risk,” Khera said.

“Genetic testing is currently used predominantly in those already affected by disease, but these data really speak to the potential of doing it in much broader populations,” Dr. Patel said. The cost of testing has decreased dramatically, and is now about $200.

If identified, risk can be reduced by interventions such as cholesterol-lowering medications, earlier screening with mammograms or colonoscopy, or surgical procedures such as a mastectomy and ovary removal.

As next steps, the researchers are performing genetic testing via an NIH research study on thousands of MGH patients who volunteered for the Partners HealthCare Biobank, aiming to identify the 1% of patients who harbor pathogenic variants and offer to work with patients and their health care teams to prevent disease before it starts.


Paper: Aniruddh P. Patel, Minxian Wang, Akl C. Fahed, Heather Mason-Suares, Deanna Brockman, Renee Pelletier, Sami Amr, Kalotina Machini, Megan Hawley, Leora Witkowski, Christopher Koch, Anthony Philippakis, Christopher A. Cassa, Patrick T. Ellinor, Sekar Kathiresan, Kenney Ng, Matthew Lebo, Amit V. Khera. Association of Rare Pathogenic DNA Variants for Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome, and Lynch Syndrome With Disease Risk in Adults According to Family History. JAMA Network Open, 2020; 3 (4): e203959 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3959

Source: Massachusetts General Hospital

Share.

About Author

ONA Editor

The ONA Editor curates oncology news, views and reviews from Australia and around the world for our readers. In aggregated content, original sources will be acknowledged in the article footer.

Leave A Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.