Tumour-seeking salmonella treats brain tumours

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

salmonella bacteria_oncology news australiaBiomedical engineers at Duke University have recruited an unlikely ally in the fight against the deadliest form of brain cancer – a strain of salmonella that usually causes food poisoning.

Clinicians sorely need new treatment approaches for glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of brain cancer.

The blood-brain barrier – a protective sheath separating brain tissue from its blood vessels – makes it difficult to attack the disease with drugs.

It’s also difficult to completely remove through surgery, as even tiny remnants inevitably spawn new tumours.

Even with the best care currently available, median survival time is a dire 15 months, and only 10 percent of patients survive five years once diagnosed.

The Duke team decided to pursue an aggressive treatment option to match its opponent, turning to the bacterium Salmonella typhimurium.

With a few genetic tweaks, the engineers turned the bacterium into a cancer-seeking missile that produces self-destruct orders deep within tumours.

Tests in rat models with extreme cases of the disease showed a remarkable 20 percent survival rate over 100 days — roughly equivalent to 10 human years — with the tumours going into complete remission.

The results appeared online in the journal Molecular Therapy – Oncolytics.

“Since glioblastoma is so aggressive and difficult to treat, any change in the median survival rate is a big deal,” said Jonathan Lyon, a PhD student working with Ravi Bellamkonda, Vinik Dean of Duke’s Pratt School of Engineering, whose laboratory is currently transitioning to Duke from Georgia Tech, where much of the work was completed.

“And since few survive a glioblastoma diagnosis indefinitely, a 20 percent effective cure rate is phenomenal and very encouraging.”

Previous studies have shown, quite accidentally, that the presence of bacteria can cause the immune system to recognise and begin attacking tumours.

head light innovation idea brain research concept_oncology news australiaHowever, follow-up clinical trials with genetically detoxified strains of S. typhimurium have since proven ineffective by themselves.

To use these common intestinal bacteria as tumour-seeking missiles, Lyon and Bellamkonda, working with lead co-author Nalini Mehta, selected a detoxified strain of S. typhimurium that was also deficient in a crucial enzyme called purine, forcing the bacteria to seek supplies elsewhere.

Tumours just so happen to be an excellent source of purine, causing the bacteria to flock to them in droves.

Then, the Duke engineers made a series of genetic tweaks so that the bacteria would produce two compounds called Azurin and p53 that instruct cells to commit suicide — but only in the presence of low levels of oxygen.

And since cancerous cells are multiplying so energetically, the environment around and within tumours has unusually low oxygen.

“A major challenge in treating gliomas is that the tumour is dispersed with no clear edge, making them difficult to completely surgically remove. So designing bacteria to actively move and seek out these distributed tumours, and express their anti-tumour proteins only in hypoxic, purine rich tumour regions is exciting,” said Ravi Bellamkonda, Vinik Dean of Duke’s Pratt School of Engineering and corresponding author of the paper.

“And because their natural toxicity has been deactivated, they don’t cause an immunological response. At the doses we used in the experiments, they were naturally cleared once they’d killed the tumours, effectively destroying their own food source.”

The researchers tested the modified bacteria by injecting them directly into the rats’ brains.

virus_oncology news australiaWhile this may sound like an extreme delivery option, the first course of action usually performed with glioblastoma is to surgically remove the primary tumour, if possible, leaving the opportunity to directly deliver therapeutics.

The treatment worked in 20 percent of the rats, causing complete tumour regression and extending their lives by 100 days, which translates to roughly 10 human years.

In the 80 percent that did not survive, however, the treatment didn’t change the length of time the rats survived.

After testing for common signs of resistance to the anti-tumour compounds and finding none, the researchers concluded the ineffectiveness was likely due to inconsistencies in the bacteria’s penetration, or to the aggressive tumour growth outpacing the bacteria.

But every rat showed initial signs of improvement after treatment.

“It might just be a case of needing to monitor the treatment’s progression and provide more doses at crucial points in the cancer’s development,” said Lyon. “However, this was our first attempt at designing such a therapy, and there is some nuance to the specific model we used, thus more experiments are needed to know for sure.”

The researchers now plan to program their bacteria to produce different drugs that cause stronger reactions in the tumours.

These will be more difficult to implement, however, as other drugs are not as specific to tumour cells as those used in this study, making potential side effects more of a concern.
[hr] Source: Duke University

Share.

About Author

ONA Editor

The ONA Editor curates oncology news, views and reviews from Australia and around the world for our readers. In aggregated content, original sources will be acknowledged in the article footer.

Comments are closed.