Sex differences identified in deadly brain tumours

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

For decades, scientists have recognised that more males get cancer and die of the disease than females.

This is true for many types of cancer, including the deadly brain tumour glioblastoma.

Now, a team of researchers led by Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis has identified distinct molecular signatures of glioblastoma in men and women that help explain such underlying disparities in patients’ response to treatment and survival.

The research suggests that tailoring treatments to men and women with glioblastoma based on the molecular subtypes of their tumours may improve survival for all patients.

The findings are published in Science Translational Medicine.

“It is our expectation that this study could have an immediate impact on the care of patients with glioblastoma and further research, as the findings indicate we should be stratifying male and female glioblastoma into risk groups and evaluating the effectiveness of treatment in a sex-specific manner,” said Joshua B. Rubin, MD, PhD, a Washington University professor of paediatrics and of neuroscience and the study’s co-senior author.

“The biology of sex differences and its applications in medicine are highly relevant but almost always ignored aspects of personalised treatments.”

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumour and kills about half of patients within 14 months of diagnosis.

It is diagnosed nearly twice as often in males, compared with females.

The tumour is most often diagnosed in people over age 50, and standard treatment is aggressive – surgery, followed by chemotherapy and radiation.

However, stubborn stem cells often survive and continue to divide, producing new tumour cells to replace the ones killed by treatment.

Most tumours recur within six months.

Studying adults with glioblastoma, the researchers found that standard treatment for glioblastoma is more effective in women than men.

To help understand such sex differences in treatment response, the researchers, including Kristin R. Swanson, PhD, a mathematical oncologist at the Mayo Clinic, measured tumour growth velocity in standard MRI scans.

“Basically, you can look at tumour growth velocity while patients are undergoing treatment and derive a value for how fast their tumours are growing,” said Rubin, who also is co-founder and co-director of the Paediatric Neuro-Oncology Program at St. Louis Children’s Hospital, where he treats patients.

“This gives you an opportunity to think more deeply about whether the drug you’re giving a patient is actually helping.”

The researchers culled patient MRI scans and survival data from a cancer research database.

They then calculated tumour growth velocity every two months for the duration of therapy in 63 glioblastoma patients – 40 males and 23 females – who received standard chemo-radiation treatment following surgery.

While initial tumour growth velocities were similar between females and males, only the females showed a steady and significant decline in tumour growth after treatment with temozolomide, the most common chemotherapy drug used to treat glioblastoma.

“The males did not respond as well, and we wanted to understand why, so we looked at the underlying genetics of patients’ tumours,” said Rubin, a co-leader of the Solid Tumour Therapeutics Program at Siteman Cancer Centre at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine.

The researchers tapped into The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) – a project launched in 2005 to pursue the genetic basis of cancer and funded by the National Cancer Institute and National Human Genome Research Institute, both of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Led by the study’s co-senior author Jingqin “Rosy” Luo, PhD, a Washington University associate professor of surgery in the Division of Public Health Sciences, and the study’s lead author, Wei “Will” Yang, PhD, a Washington University bioinformaticist in the Department of Genetics, the researchers applied sophisticated statistical algorithms to distinguish male- or female-specific gene expression patterns from such patterns that were shared among the male and female patients.

The team then focused on the sex-specific gene expression to identify molecular subtypes that corresponded to differences in survival for males and for females.

“We observed tremendous genetic sex differences in the tumours of glioblastoma patients that correlated with survival,” Luo said.

“All evidence supports the need to define these distinctions and incorporate the sex differences into glioblastoma biology research and treatment.”

Specifically, the researchers showed that the tumours of patients with glioblastoma cluster into 10 distinct subtypes – five for tumours in males and five for tumours in females.

The clusters are distinguished by gene activity and survival.

For example, females with tumours in one such cluster survived longer than females with tumours in any of the other four clusters – just over three years compared with just over one year.

Similarly, they found a male cluster linked to longer survival – just over 18 months compared with just over one year for men with tumours in the other clusters.

The researchers validated the clusters in three additional data sets and also showed that even genes activated at similar levels in tumours in males and females can result in substantial sex-specific effects on survival.

“Additionally, we identified genetic pathways that correlated with the longest survival, and they were very different in males compared with females,” Rubin said.

“For example, in males survival was all about regulating cell division, which suggests that drugs that block cell-cycle progression may be more effective in men. For females, survival was all about regulating invasiveness, which suggests that drugs targeting integrin signalling may be more effective in women. This tells us it might be better to separate males and females and examine their sex-specific genetic signatures. We tested this hypothesis by doing a series of in vitro drug screens in which we took four relatively common chemo drugs and looked at how the expression of these genes correlated with response to those drugs. In both males and females, there was a clear correlation.”

Among diseases in general, sex differences are often tied to hormones.

For example, the female hormone estrogen contributes significantly to more women getting breast cancer than men.

However, with glioblastoma diagnosis and survival, sex hormones did not directly contribute to female and male differences, Rubin said. “The sex-specific genetic activity in glioblastoma is not dependent on the acute actions of circulating sex hormones as differences are evident across all stages of life.”

“In a broader sense, I want our research to encourage people to think more about how diseases uniquely affect males and females, making it the norm and not the exception,” Rubin added. “I hope the research will inspire more specific approaches to treatments. It may be that we shouldn’t be using the same criteria when treating diseases in males and females, and as a next step we should definitely develop and evaluate sex-specific treatment regimens for glioblastoma.”

In addition to researchers at Washington University and the Mayo Clinic, scientists at the Cleveland Clinic, Case Western Reserve University and TGen, a genomics research institute, also contributed to the study.


Source: Washington School of Medicine

Share.

About Author

ONA Editor

The ONA Editor curates oncology news, views and reviews from Australia and around the world for our readers. In aggregated content, original sources will be acknowledged in the article footer.

Leave A Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.