Final verdict on finasteride: Safe, effective prevention for prostate cancer

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

Finasteride, a generic hormone-blocking drug, was found to reduce the risk of prostate cancer by 25 percent in the landmark Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT).

Long- term data, published today in the New England Journal of Medicine, show that reduction in prostate cancer risk has continued and fewer than 100 men on the trial died from the disease.

SWOG Cancer Research Network, an international cancer clinical trials group funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), part of the National Institutes of Health, opened the PCPT for enrolment 25 years ago.

The PCPT enrolled 18,882 men from 1993 to 1997, making it one of the largest prostate cancer clinical trials ever conducted.

New results, which reported participant deaths over two decades, show that finasteride has the lasting effect of reducing prostate cancer risk.

Results also eliminate concerns over initial findings of a possible risk of more aggressive cancers with finasteride use.

“Finasteride is safe, inexpensive, and effective as a preventive strategy for prostate cancer,” said Ian Thompson, Jr, MD, principal investigator of the PCPT for SWOG.

“Doctors should share these results with men who get regular prostate-specific antigen tests that screen for the presence of prostate cancer. The drug will have its greatest effect in this group of men.”

Thompson is chair of SWOG’s genitourinary cancer committee and serves as president of CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Hospital – Medical Centre in San Antonio, Texas and as emeritus professor at the University of Texas Health Science Centre.

Along with SWOG biostatisticians Catherine Tangen, DrPH, and Phyllis Goodman, MS, of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centere, Thompson sought to determine whether the increased number of high-grade cancers detected through the PCPT years ago would result in more prostate cancer deaths over time.

SWOG published the first PCPT results in 2003. Investigators reported a significant, positive result: finasteride reduced prostate cancer risk by 25 percent.

But the study also cast a shadow on the drug, the first 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor which targets and blocks the action of androgens like testosterone and is commonly used to treat lower urinary tract problems in men and also male pattern baldness.

The results showed that finasteride increased the number of high-grade prostate cancers – a finding that resulted in a drug label warning posted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

That warning persists to this day.

So is finasteride safe in the long run?

Thompson, Tangen, and Goodman matched participants to the National Death Index, a centralised database of death record information managed by the U.S. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.

This analysis allowed the SWOG team to determine if a trial participant had died, and if so, the cause of death.

With almost 300,000 person-years of follow-up and a median follow-up of 18.4 years, they found 42 deaths due to prostate cancer on the finasteride arm and 56 on the placebo arm.

Thus, there was no statistically significant increased risk of prostate cancer death with finasteride.

In the NEJM letter, the team notes that a cheap, reliable prostate cancer prevention drug will have a big impact on public health.

Due to a rise in screening for the disease, prostate cancer diagnoses are on the rise, with the American Cancer Society estimating that 164,690 American men would be diagnosed in 2018.

While many of these cancers will be slow-growing, and not life-threatening, they are still often treated with surgery and radiation, resulting in common complications such as impotence and incontinence.

“There are significant negative consequences to patients’ health and quality of life that can result from prostate cancer treatment, as well as to their finances and their peace of mind,”

Thompson said. “If we can save people from surgeries, and scores of examinations and tests, and spare them from living for years with fear, we should. The best-case scenario for patients is prevention, and this trial has found an inexpensive medication that gets us there.”


Source: SWOG

Share.

About Author

ONA Editor

The ONA Editor curates oncology news, views and reviews from Australia and around the world for our readers. In aggregated content, original sources will be acknowledged in the article footer.

Leave A Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.